Donald Trump won!! Now the LEFT is having a temper tantrum.

HE WON!

It is official! Donald Trump is officially the president-elect of the United States of America.  The future 45th president has already rocked the "world order" of the elites as they saw it.  I have my suspicions that I will elaborate upon in upcoming posts, but for this specific post, I will talk about the temper tantrum being thrown by the lefties, the media and millennials with no clue.

My facebook feed in the days following the election were filled with virtue signaling and "support" for those in states of depression.  I'm not going to lie, if Hillary had won, I'd have been pretty down, but I would not have sought out online cuddles by expressing a "deep sadness" or a "literal shaking".  I saw too many posts (posted by white people) about how white people should not celebrate or tell people not to be afraid, because they weren't white.

This is of course, ridiculous.  We've heard that those who voted for Trump are, of course, racist.  This is absurd.  The fact is that 33% of the counties that voted for Obama TWICE voted for Trump in this election. According to election maps, not many counties flipped from Republican to democrat, but the reverse was pretty impressive, especially in solid democrat "strongholds".  The fact is that the democrat party, the DNC tried to shove a candidate down the throats of Americans that we were NOT enthused about, nor did we trust.

It is funny how the "left" or the "progressives" are shouting rage and grief in the wake of the election.  This article for example on why ethnic minorities are scared by HuffPo is at the top of the snobbery list.  We have, as a society, been informed on a constant basis in the last few years of the evils of american history.  While there is much to be desired in the history of America and human society as a whole, the critics never point to historical facts that put social anxieties and accusations into perspective.

Of the blacks residing in the South, 261,988 were not slaves. Of this number, 10,689 lived in New Orleans. The country's leading African American historian, Duke University professor John Hope Franklin, records that in New Orleans over 3,000 free Negroes owned slaves, or 28 percent of the free Negroes in that city. 

Not to delve too deeply into a history lesson, there are many educated minorities that are aware of the fraud that is how "unfair" America is to black people.  Is the system skewed in the direction of the white male? Yes, probably so, but not to the degree (especially in 2016) which merits riots and crying sessions and "safe spaces" for college students who are anticipating the 3rd reich in America.  

Supposedly "educated" college students and graduates with Master's degrees have debated with me the unfairness of society, citing the gap of influence due to the atrocity of slavery.  Of course slavery was a savage and nightmarish practice that is only of the highest good to humanity it is abolished, but there are universal truths that destroy any talking point of the bleeding heart that tries to piggy back on the latest sympathy plea.

I personally find it offense when I spoiled white college student argues harder for the strife of black people in America than I do and they have ZERO facts, only emotional arguments.  At the peak of black slavery in the South, only 6 percent of Southern whites owned slaves. If you include the white people in the North, it means that only 1.4 percent of white Americans owned black slaves at the HEIGHT of slavery. An estimated 3,000 blacks owned a total of 20,000 black slaves in the year 1860.  If you listened to the "liberal" media, they would have you think that every white person who has ever existed has family that has owned black slaves.  It is estimated that 40% of all Americans today can trace their parentage to immigrants that arrived here from Ellis Island. That means a very small fraction of Americans have had family that have been in America since the Revolution or the Civil War and an even smaller amount of those people can be found to have ancestors who actually owned slaves. 

So who owes reparations?  Who needs to apologize to black people?  It seems t hat the majority of racism against black people in the 20th century was most likely cause by immigrants from Europe who integrated rapidly and adopted the disdain for black people as a way to blend in further.  


Is the Fear Justified?

CNN's Van Jones called Trump's win a "whitelash". He ought to be ashamed of himself.  His rhetoric is just as inflammatory or more than anything Trump has said.  Knowing the state of affairs in America today, the people who are most likely to cause violence based off of "bad news", he should choose his words about who is dishing out the "lashes" much more carefully.  This was a ridiculous statement and many of the major news networks are aware of the fact that Trump supporters are not solely white.  MSNBC had been caught with their paradigm pants down when they went to interview a black man about the racism of Trump and he turned out to be a supporter.

Yes, there are many reasons for minorities to feel anxiety because there are some absolutely crazy people out there who ALWAYS seem to get it wrong.  There is however, something the left seems to constantly get wrong.  While the left seems to focus on race so much, they miss the fact that culture is much more important.  The question of nature versus nurture is solved when we think about our society.  Yes, you are much more likely to have seen a scene like that of the video below reversed in the 30s or 40s or even 70s.  Why is it now that the situation is reversed and there are black people beating up a white man with no regard to the consequences.

It is called societal norms.  When you create a societal norm that deems it acceptable for black people to beat up white people because white people are inherently "bad" and "racist", that takes precedent to race.  Black men are not inherently more violent because of the color of their skin.  White men are not more racist because of the color of theirs.  That is nonsense.

If the left were as tolerant as they say, Van Jones would have not called the election of Trump a "whitelash".  To simply assume that white people voted for Trump because he was the antithesis of Obama based just upon his "race" is absurd.  White people are more likely to jump party lines and vote across the board because they are more concerned with policy.  In the mid-west social policy holds more sway than economic policy may play in the east, but regardless, white votes take precedence because both parties know that their loyalty has a cost.

Black people have culturally been indoctrinated to believe that the democratic party is the only option they have, because they "aren't racist".  This is beyond laughable, of course.  Not just history is being considered in understanding the ridiculousness of the statement, but if racism is as prevalent, malicious and devious as is believed, why is there some "invisible wall" over the democratic party that somehow "filters" out the racists?

Back to the temper tantrum of the left...

"MoveOn.org" and George Soros are back at it again.  After being exposed by Project Veritas in the fall, the Clinton Campaign hit major controversy (that the media ignored) as the internet was abuzz with news that protesters (often violent) were paid to "Bird-dog".  The term "birddogging" was coined to define a type of agitation and provocation meant to create violence at Trump rallies.  The point was so the media could capture it all on camera, witnessing Trump supporters beating poor black people, bringing up memories of racial violence during the Civil Rights era.  This was a simple manipulation.

Now the Left is being paid to protest again.  They are protesting Trump on every ground from "racism" to being a detriment to the environment.  Trump has become essentially a composite villain from an episode of Captain Planet for ignorant "safe space" millennials. Trump is the businessman rendition of Lex Luther, an evil capitalist bent on world domination, mixed with some loose Hitler comparisons and KKK boogeyman fears.  These fears, in my experience, are mostly being held by young white college students.  The majority of the warnings to white people against telling minorities to "calm down" have come from young white people. Hypocrisy if I've ever seen it.

I can understand if those in the LGBTQ community are alarmed by Mike Pence. Pence would not have been my first choice for VP, but so is life.  However, calls for Trump's assassination would expedite the gay communities worst nightmare.  I've tried to explain to my gay compatriots that it would be political suicide to try to rescind gay marriage. Most Americans really don't care. There's no profit in that crusade and Trump himself has said it is a done deal.

I foresee the fear mongering and the orgy of anger running over if the media keep promoting the non-existent ties Trump has to "white nationalist" groups. Yes, there are crazies out there that hope Trump is the "south rising" again, but Trump is and always has been a New York liberal elite with conservative leanings.  Nothing the neo nazi groups, nor the evangelicals represent is important enough for him to go on a crusade for; he is NOT Obama. He is NOT an ideologue.  In essence, Trump's main concern is repairing a maligned economy.  Is gay marriage an issue? No. Is Marijuana legalization a major concern? No.

The media's attempt to activate black americans and black nationalist groups like black lives matter will fail. Black people already felt as though the election held nothing for them this election cycle as soon as it started. Most inner-city blacks are barely coming to grips with Obama leaving office. Others were more prone to lean Trump until the coordinated attack by the media and Clinton camp to demonize Trump as a racist. Sanders never held any real appeal to black people in masse. Black people don't really believe in utopia the way liberal hippies do (unless it comes in black preacher voice). Hillary Clinton, simply put, is not Bill.

I will talk about the unfortunate trap that lie ahead for America and how we can avoid it. It is highly unlikely we will. Things are accelerating much too fast, and the emotionally charged atmosphere creates an even deeper chasm to cross to educate. Stay tuned.

How Orlando Shooting Confirmed Trump

Here we are.  It is the summer of 2016 and as promised, the Jihad on America has begun.  This is not fear-mongering, this is a simple statement that is shining a light on events.  The top imams of the world have called for a Jihad.  They have called for a "breeding" out of western culture.  The migrant crisis in Europe, the attacks in Paris and in San Bernardino were simply the tips of the iceberg.

Who is at fault for this travesty?  Of course it is the neo-cons, the Cheney's, the Rumsfelds, the Bush's.  Hillary Clinton is a neo-con in liberal sheep clothing, waiting to uncloak, but the problems that we have now have been writ large in the infamous PNAC document that so many have forgotten about.  The PNAC (project for a new american century) document states that there must be a war started in the middle east to create a "clash of civilization" wherein the military-industrial complex will rise from the ashes of its failures in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The plan has always been to cripple the military in a move to call for an even greater military than ever.  The expansion of radical Islam in the middle east (per the Arab Spring) that was facilitated by the Clinton State Department, has spread the chaos all over the world.  Syria is in freefall.  Lybia has collapsed.  We, in the West, are showing the kind of compassion that resembles putting a gun to our head.  And where is Saudi Arabia, our great ally, with its great wealth, all of its US aid packages to help people of their great unifying religion?  The simple answer is Saudi Arabia has had much to do with producing this pond scum that attack gay nightclubs, knowing these places are soft targets.

The attack in Orlando is a clear act of religious extremist Islamic terror.  Yet, somehow the mainstream media again, misses the mark.  The subject has now turned to gun control.  The gun control argument is complete nonsense because the shooter in Orlando had a gun license as a security guard in one of the world's largest private security companies G4S.  Getting a gun license as a security guard requires more clearance checks than simply going into a gun shop and purchasing as a private citizen.  Also, reports are saying that the FBI interviewed the shooter three times!  Why wasn't this guy put away if he was under FBI investigation?  Our future "goddess-in-chief"  Hillary Clinton's state department snuffed out the investigation, stating it's "unfairness" under civil rights.  The egg SHOULD be on her face, but....

GUNS!!!

Trump's presidency should be assured now, right?  Well, Trump being who and what he is, that is a ball that is still in the air.  However, the proof will only come out more and more as the political class that hides behind lobbies tries to cover their failures with more soft speech of acceptance.

Of course the invasion of Iraq was wrong.  Of course the devastation of the middle east by the western powers has been egregious, however, it is hard enough to talk to someone from the same culture with similar liberal western views and respect for women.  If we were to "listen" to these radicalized men with no sense of respect for life, let alone women, we'd only hear "allahu ackbar" as we received a knife to the neck.

As I stated before, a bizzarre connection between Black Lives Matter and radical Islam will form and we will start to see it more and more in the US.  I see it ever more as BLM protests Donald Trump.  All the Social Justice Warriors and BLM prove is that they haven't the capacity for decent and logical conversation.  The ability to communicate is disintegrating.  When the full disintegration occurs, there may be a second civil war.  Will the SJW's and LGBT fight? No.  The fighters will be the radical Islamist and the more hardened BLM supporters. The larger hispanic gangs from Mexico and Central and South America will most likely do their own thing and grow their own version of corruption.  That's a discussion for another time completely.

Trump has been confirmed.  The statements he's made, the way he's made them, however obscene or crude, were true.  The media is now telling us that Donald Trump never said that more attacks would happen even though they had to come clean and give him credit for saying Brussels had problems months before the bombing there.

The question now is whether Trump will create the spark for an all out explosion or will calmer heads prevail and Americans come together to understand we are like an infected body, contaminated by an outside virus.

The RISE of Donald Trump and WARNINGS!

Today is February 24th in the year of 2016.  Donald Trump has essentially done what, six months ago, all of the vampire media said would fizzle in a few short weeks.  Donald Trump has proven that he should get the Republican Party nomination.  He won in New Hampshire.  He won in South Carolina. And now he has won in a state of crooked caucuses: Nevada.

Trump had a stake in the state with his casino strategically placed, but my fear of theft came in the form of Casino Magnate Sheldon Adelson.  Adelson was one of the largest initial contributors to Marco Rubio's campaign.  So with the "Robot" Rubio "surging" ahead in NH and SC, I only doubted Trump's ability to overcome the Sheldon strong-hold where the "hanky-panky" was off the charts for Hillary.

But....

Donald Trump's rise is due in part that he doesn't go around begging for money (like 99.9% of politicians), he has the celebrity presence, he speaks the way that a normal person does (not in sound bytes), and he does things like this....Donald Trump Steals the Show.

Trump's meteoric rise is due LARGELY in part to paying lip-service to the disenfranchised.  Obama was NOT the great unifier he campaigned as in 2008.  If he was no one would have a problem with his "race".  However, racially based politics has exploded in ways unseen since the 60's and prior.  The vast promotion of minorities (while doing nothing to actually improve their societal position) has been largely a "force feeding" by the public relations arm of Obama's white house.

Just Obama being elected in and of itself should have been a signifier of two things: A) Winning by popular vote, gaining a majority white vote as well as a crossover appeal, should have dispelled the perception of INSURMOUNTABLE racial inequality in this nation. B) We do indeed live in a democracy and minorities are truly accepted in the modern world despite the few exceptions (note: a 'few' where there are cases in the millions makes the 'few' situations number in the 10's of thousands)

During Obama's administration, his loyal state-run media in the form of MSNBC (that is known to receive government funding) and the like have utilized the administration's talking points about POTUS being stonewalled in every possible way solely on the basis on the color of his skin.  If this were truly the issue, the ELECTORAL COLLEGE would have never allowed him the position.

Republicans have betrayed their supporters and stances many times and 62% of republican constituents feel betrayed by bought off Republicans.  What drives me crazy, that comes from the left is their support of liberal ideas and Bernie Sanders, who says get big money interests out of politics, but seem to only attribute this corruption to Republicans. I don't get it?

Why is this an important point?  The Republican "betrayal" of their own constituents for the "quick buck" has led to an increased anger in Trump supporters. Obama's amnesty for the "DREAMers" is nothing more than another "selling out" of the American people.  The need for "cheap" labor to compete with developing nations like China and Mexico come on the heels of large trade agreements from decades past, the effects of which are now being felt today.  NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) is in essence as Ross Perot called it, "The giant sucking sound".

Now, Obama's administration is pushing for the TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership).  A deal in which China will immensely benefit again when it comes to trade and regulation, allowing a virtual "free market" - which will really be a state-run, fascist/communist/"socialist"worker's union.  There is very little political resistance from either party to this new measure.  I suppose the political "elite" believe this will line their already thick pockets even more.

The "outsiders" of Bernie and Trump are speaking to this, and people are resonating. Add to this, Obama's weak, deviating foreign policy that has not only ALLOWED alqaeda and ISIS to flourish, but FUNDED!! Trump is pointing it out when most of the republican (not to mention democrat) establishment are staying quiet because Obama says let's NOT call this "Islamic Terror", simply because he deems the group to not be Islamic?

At first this line worked, because the American people were exhausted with the word terrorism when there had been no activity on that front in a few years.  However, the failure of Obama to invade Syria 'on schedule' (google: PNAC) back in 2012 & 13' led to a different tactic, the rise of ISIS.  Although, US intelligence agencies were training and arming the "Syrian Rebels" (AlQaeda in syria), the goal was always a US occupation of the area.  The military said no and the "arab spring" started by social media hit a stand still.

Then we had the Paris attacks and San Bernardino and the migrant crisis in Europe last year and even people who were on the fence about calling islamic extremism by its name had had enough. Especially since the attacks perpetuated by a known radicalized FOREIGN faction were blamed on the 2nd amendment. 

The self-identified American people were done.

Last week, Obama met with the group Black Lives Matter to discuss their goals and greivances. This week in the midst of the FBI begging APPLE for 'backdoors' to the phone of the muslim attackers in San Bernardino (that they don't even need), guess who shows up to protest APPLE's protest against the FBI?  You guessed it! #Black Lives Matter....

Tie this all together and what do you get?


A large group of disenfranchised Americans who see the machinations of Obama's advisors and administration leading to an America that looks more like the UK than the US.

In essence, Americans are disgusted with the fake liberal 'PC' culture. Oh, no don't offend anyone. Oh, no, that person is crying! The U.S.A was not built on keeping quiet to protect someone else's feelings.  You may never know what can trigger someone. The crunching from eating cereal could trigger a Vietnam veteran to flashbacks to a night of terror in the jungle. Are we going to BAN loud eating?

The trouble down the road with Trump's meteoric rise is that there are many (too many) 'Americans' that would like loud eating to be banned if it reminded a woman of a movie she watched about another woman being sexually attacked.  This is something that makes me want to do a serious face palm.  The problem is that, I myself, as a black person, understand some of the triggers that many blacks deem racist.  However, my priority is Freedom, not the illusion of said freedom.  Freedom is not freedom from harm or pain, but absolute, meaning that anything goes in essence.

So how can we determine the difference between right and wrong?  Right and wrong should be personal choices based off of fundamental principles.  This is the purpose of our constitution.  Freedom is not a 1,000 page document of rules and regulations.  The closest thing we can have to it and operate in a large society are guiding principles akin to the Ten commandments or something.

Although Trump himself may not be a bastion of freedom, I find it ironic that in his actions he represents freedom so much more than many in the Libertarian movement.  The Libertarian establishment has (in recent years) become much more pliant to the republican establishment. This seems to be in part to the nature of Rand Paul's personality and his 'planned' ascendancy to the position of POTUS.  I think his best shot for this is AFTER a SUCCESSFUL Trump presidency.

That is the keyword there: Success.  If Trump's presidency is riddled with the dirty tricks of recession/depression, race riots, failed military adventurism, and failed infrastructure projects, we can pretty much be assured of a collapse of America (complete with UN troops on the streets) and the rise of a Socialist-Communist modeled economy.  American would look like Africa, heavily indebted to banks with civil conflicts and warlords taking over areas and being deposed every other week.

Let's pray for success.  But TRULY success lies in the hands of the American people.  Trump's rise is only one piece to the puzzle to restore American Capitalism.  The other pieces that must be completed by the people must be a proper defense of civil liberties (even AGAINST Trump, if he dare), and entrepreneurial enterprise. Trump or any other POTUS for that matter, can only do so much to bring wealth into the country. It is up to the ingenuity of the people to restore the REPUBLIC and be the bastion of HOPE and WEALTH for the world.

How I Came to Worship Women: Part 2

The positive of our Millennial "zeal" is that we are BUCKING the old systems that don't work for us.  I believe this process of trial and error will take at least until the end of this century to truly settle in, where there isn't some new, upsetting, offending idea every week, everyday!

We are bucking ideas like the picture above (as much as that has been the best my experience in a loving relationship).  Modern me, for the most part, believe that women deserve equal respect in society.  The problem that I see is that men are all too willing to reject ALL of the old definitions of what it means to be a man sometimes, because of how badly we've been let down by our male "role-models" throughout our lives.

For most young men, our role models came through music, calling women "bitches" and "hoes" in rap or screaming out emo confessions of a love so "strong" in can be suicidal. These are contradictory and confusing notions.  Women have not had it any easier with their programming of becoming "complete" in a relationship, but simultaneously being "independent women".  Our fake culture is definitely to blame, marketing that our parents had never experienced on such a sophisticated level; they were the "beta test".

HOW I LEARNED TO BE A "MAN" 

I grew up believing that my mother and father had an "ideal" relationship.  As I grew into puberty, into adulthood, I began to see the discrepancies, the differences between my imaginary perceptions of the "perfect" parents and what really was.  My father left our family when I was a teenager, and I had to come to accept that although he did the best he could with the tools he was given, he'd learned how to abandon from his father.  I was lucky enough to have a father all the way into my teens, but in the end, I realized that he'd stayed for so long to prove a point.  He hadn't had his biological father grow up with him and as a result, did have an "identity" as a man.  My grandfather was a pimp at one time (a real pimp), and from what my father knew of him molded his "Quasimodo" male identity and he'd limped on ever since.  

I was raised by a "macho-man" who increased the strain in his own life by continuously trying to prove it. In the process, he smothered my mother, and didn't allow her to bloom like the flower she was.  Long story short, I am a man now. I have my own family and my own partner.  Nothing has been more infuriating that watching myself (genetically/psychologically) re-enact the scenes my father dealt with in his struggle for "manhood".  

Then one day I said, "Fuck it." Not because I had given up, but because I had GIVEN IN. I collapsed into the love that I was witnessing unfolding before myself everyday, from my kids, from my woman.  That ever unfolding love taught me that Being a man isn't about being in control, it is about riding the waves of uncertainty and learning to be reborn everyday, being better everyday.

EMBRACING BIOLOGY

The human biology, formed over millennia, is perhaps the most miraculous thing I've experienced. We see the importance of the X-Chromosone (female) to cognitive abilities and higher intelligence HERE. We also can see the impact that a relationship (especially one that involves intercourse) can have on the female biology HERE. However, the most amazing aspect of WOMAN (or how my hippy friends spell it Womb-man) is the ability to give birth, to grow something from nothing and create all that the life form needs to survive on FROM THE INSIDE-OUT!!

I watched my children be born, naturally, vaginally.  Yeah, it can be gross sometimes, but that is the carry over from our ancestors. It is what makes us human, connected to the earth.  The fluids that the baby travels through in the birth canal and out of the vagina, coat him/her in a plethora of healthy bacteria, protecting the baby from illness.  The mother's milk is filled with nutrients that boost the immune system and increase the child's brain size many times over! The act of nursing, breast-feeding creates so many neuronal connections that will be beneficial for the child over the course of their lifetimes!!

WOMEN ARE GODDESSES TO BE WORSHIPED! DESIGNED AND BUILT BY NATURE TO GIVE LOVE INDISCRIMINATELY!

Now before you think I've gone off the deep end, let me be perfectly clear.  The Japanese, in their religion of Shinto worship nature. The Taoists of China worship the changes of nature and the patterns that influence man.  Many of the numerous Native American tribes of North and South America understood the rhythms of nature, their importance. Many African tribes, the Dogon are of note, studied the stars through astronomy to make sense of their place in the cosmos. THEY ALL WORSHIPPED NATURE, but I assure you, that did not mean that they fell to their knees and started kissing the ground when a wild bear or lion or whatever flew out of the bush trying to kill them.

I worship the IDEA of WOMAN, the feminine energy, just as I worship my own (masculine).  When we give praise to the gifts given to us by...WHATEVER, we come closer to knowing the truth of ourselves.  I'm not saying fall over and grovel every time some Basic Bitch walks by. What I am saying is we should all worship her potential.

To worship woman is to worship ourselves, our own divinity, because there is not one man on this planet that did not come from one. So in essence, the male-feminists are right (to an extent). A woman is something to be adored. However, in our plastic culture of capitalist marketing, men have the smallest slice of the pie. Women account for 85% of retail sales. This could be the reason why men (and their importance) has been so marginalized as of late, in the media. They aren't seen as important to the money hungry corporate marketeers.  

We must get back to the balance of things. Men need to stand up and be "MEN" finding their own definitions that complete the biological circuit, finding bliss in the ever expanding journey of the human race. And Women need to stand up and be "WOMEN" instead of pawns in a marketing scheme, consistently triggered by the phrase "War on Women", barely recovered from the PTSD of the past century (I GET IT). 

In the end, although I have my critiques of both genders, I am a true believer in the power of P***Y!

 We will overcome the bulls*** together. 

 You guys are nothing but pure magic....

 

How I Came to Worship Women: Part 1

Whatever the definition of a "Real Woman", we all have our idea of what our ideal one may be. Women would like to envision themselves, strong, bold and unimpeded by the chains set by society. Men (as is seen in the fascination with Ronda Rousey and many other bada** females in today's world) would love to have a woman that can take control and lead the way. Unfortunately, for many"men" this is a fantasy that can only be lived in the space between their ears. 

WARNING!! I am a firm believer in bad news first, then the good news. Bare with me. It gets better in part 2.

WHY ARE MEN NO LONGER MEN? 

We live in a society of immediacy, of "gimme" and "gimme now" or "gimme faster".  I don't know about everyone else, but I have taken a look at the apparent differences between my generation of men and that of my father's, his father's.  For those not held hostage by the label "millennial", they grew up in a different world. If my father were to take a time machine from his childhood in the 60's and 70's to modern day, he would be astonished, shocked, probably a little scared, and very much so out of place.  

Our society is still filtered with the definitions of the past to describe who we are in the present as we march ceaselessly into the future.  Men are still held to the standards of the perfect man, the John Wayne type, if not to women, then in their own mind's.  When our father's told us "Be a man.", this is what we had imagined. This is what we had imagined our fathers to be.  Add on top of this the hyper masculinity of our biggest action heroes of the 80's and 90's and we are completely out of our league already when it comes to any female in our own psyche.  This is, in my belief, the cause of such male emasculation in our society- the desire to live up to the fallacy of "MANHOOD". 

We males have been pumped with so much testosterone action cartoons in our youth while in school we had to sit calmly, play nicely, and not be aggressive.  This is very confusing.  I look at my childhood through to my high school days and can only imagine how screwed up our boys are now that politically correct rhetoric has infiltrated the public schooling system. 

My point in saying all this is: when you see a guy who is timid, but is obviously infatuated with a female, but is the nice guy, but still has male sexual urges, it is most likely his SUPED-UP/CALM DOWN programming from childhood sending him conflicting messages about how to engage in a serious relationship.  I have seen guys go for years without a girlfriend simply because they don't know how to relate. The guys that fight or reject their programming either become calloused or complete jerks. 

THE MALE "FEMINIST"

WARNING!!! This is not to put anyone down or to discredit their true commitment, only an observation of what I have witnessed in the behavior of many of my friends and associates, peers, so on..etc    

The male-feminist is the ultimate culmination of the programming that we as males have undergone throughout our childhood.   In essence, I believe that the resulting male-feminist has been trained from early childhood to yield over to the authority of a woman.  In elementary school you were with a woman for 8 hours a day who told you how to play, talk, read, write, and so on.  In high school, the odds of you having more male teachers increased, but we all know that education is a primarily female dominated profession (nothing wrong with that).  Yet we must take a real look at how our society has changed in the last  60 years.  

In my father's day, a young single woman in the community was not as common.  The single-parent family was not common place.  The role of the woman (no matter how archaic it may have been) was clearly laid out.  As we move forward in time, the role of the woman in society underwent radical changes and freedom that had little to do with "voting" or "wearing a bra" had been found.  Women had started and continue to gain more and more respect in the society (as they should).  As we know, however, with change comes challenge and although there have been exciting progressions, the adjustments to these have "rocked the boat" for families.  

When my father was in school, as a boy, only one parent needed to work. This means, no matter how many hours you were stuck in a classroom with the teacher, you could come home and KNOW who your parent was.  Embarrassing to say the least, however I know I'm not the only one- I have called my teacher "Mom" on more than one occasion.  I caught myself (even as a child) and though, "Wow! I'm spending way too much time with this person." 

The male feminist lives in a society in which he may have been disconnected from his mother (she may have had to work), estranged from his father (who also had to work) who may not have had the time to "teach" him how to be a man. So where do most of our role models come from? Simple answer: Television. We (millennials) are a generation raised on the tube.  Male feminists exist in a Disney fantasy (as many of us do) where if we do not have the compliance or acceptance of the female, somehow we have failed. Compare this to the "heroes" of the 50's, 60's, 70's that couldn't care less about the opinions of the "love interest" or any other woman who may have had more than two lines in a scene. 

This is what brings me to my next point.  The generation of Millennials is that of rebellion. We are the "rebels without a cause", all too often given one based on principles that we firmly believe but with political ramifications most rarely understand (occupy wallstreet is a good example).  We aspire to be the care-free hippies of old but with the "shared responsibility" slogans of a revised Marxism.  We are indeed confused. 

 

Black Lives Matter 5 Shot in Minneapolis: The Road to Civil War

Prediction:  When the right-wing of the bird of politics gets its foot into the oval office, the George Soros funded "Black Lives Matter" group will be seen on rare occasion working with Islamic radical terrorist groups here in America.

In response to this, white-dominated "militias" will retaliate.

In an early stage of my prediction, it seems late last night a group of white men allegedly fired into a crowd of black lives matter protesters.  This could be the start of the race war, the State Department and George Soros have been attempting to rouse for years now.

Before I start, I want to say that I believe that Black Lives Matter has many many well meaning followers, but it's leaders seem to be following some bizarre version of a communist doctrine, Alinsky-esque.

As a black male myself, I have viewed this movement as a contrived attempt at division from its inception.  Is there merit to the pleas that the group has stated? Yes.  Is crime by police officers toward blacks as high as they would have you believe? No.  It is well noted and known for years that black on black crime is higher than any other crime perpetuated by blacks or toward blacks.

The civil rights movement of the 50's and 60's was completely justified in the fact that A) Black people were not treated equally in this country and many in the south still lived under Jim Crow laws and B) Black people did not commit crime against one another on the scale to which we do today.
To be taken seriously in any time, you must carry yourself in a respectable way.  Many of the revived "sit-ins" that BLM tries to employ are simply obnoxious demonstrations of power and dominance over the subject audience.

This is possibly the most disgusting demonstration of dominance I have ever seen.  The "protesters" are wrong on too many fronts to count, but I will try to account for a few.  Firstly, who are they protesting in a library occupied by only a few fellow students?  The "protesters" outnumber the students quietly studying, it seems, 4 to 1.  Why protest in the library where no one will see you? They just keep repeating the slogan "Black Lives Matter!" in a crazed chant as if any of the students occupying the library have proven themselves bigots or racists.

This is something straight out of Saul Alinsky.  To agitate and agitate until it creates a provocation.  Yesterday's events are the provocation.  Ignoring this "movement" (that has no goals nor demands) is the best way to solve the problem.  The only reason why we cannot simply ignore the BLM movement is because of the "threat" on the horizon: the merger of radical islam and the black lives matter movement.  Sounds crazy, no?

The Black Power movement of the 60's has a very close link to Islam in the distorted Nation of Islam doctrine, made popular by the powerful oration of Malcolm X. Malcolm X eventually realized his divisive message was playing into the hands of those who really control the world and changed his message, most likely leading to his death at the hands of those he fought for.

Most of these BLM people are spoiled black kids from working class backgrounds, many of them are in college! I can't for the life of me figure why they are angry.  Most of the BLM protesters have probably never experienced REAL RACISM that their parents and grandparents might have. These were the kids that in high school had all of the newest clothes, listened to the newest rap music and had very little to do with the lifestyle that was talked about in the music.  They may have been once or twice removed from it.

The #Mizzou student, Eric Butler, who organized a "hunger strike" to protest the "white privilege" of the University's president was caught red-handed in having a bit of "privilege" of his own.

"The newspaper reported that Eric L. Butler, Butler’s father, is an executive vice president for sales and marketing for the Union Pacific Railroad. Eric Butler’s 2014 compensation was $8.4 million, according to a required filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the family’s net worth tops $20 million."  This seems not to matter to Black Lives Matter however, the amount of money one has doesn't seem to eliminate the "lack of privilege" one has.

Now they're in college, they are angry, and they want revenge on the teachers they had in high school who treated them like "hoodlums" although they got fairly good grades in school.

What ideology and background matches with the people we see in BLM?  Many of the Islamic Radicals, like those of the Boston Bombing, were in college, on their way to a possible future of success.  They then became filled with the vitriol of a hateful ideology that blamed the west for all of their problems.

The "Great White Hope" politically on the right seems to be Donald Trump.  He spouts the rights' tea party ideology and this is just the perfect mix of problems to create a spark in this country that will turn into a fireball.

Trump's comments on the BLM protester needing to be "roughed up" is only the kind of rhetoric that will set-up a civil war within this country.  Neither side will be justified. Neither side will get the freedom they expect or want, just a pile of bodies.

 

Part 2: The explanation for the ISIS link-up

Russian Jet Shot Down by Turkey!! Fog of War-Inching to WW3

Today, has begun a new chapter in the march toward another global conflict.  A Russian fighter was reportedly shot down by Turkey, for supposedly, flying in Turkish air space.  Another day in a combat zone, or a real concern for those anxiously watching the world burn?

This is all too familiar to history.  We are witnessing a replay of events that led up to the "Great War" and the Second World War. Although all looked peaceful on the surface at the G20 in Turkey, Syria seems to be the showdown point, but it is only the beginning.  To completely understand the situation that we are currently in, we must go back a couple of decades (although the roots of these problems go back hundreds of years).

To go back over one hundred years is to speak about British Intelligence helping the tribe of Saud to conquer their enemies in the region and establish the puppet state of Saudi Arabia in an effort to control energy resources for the west.  To go back four decades would be an effort to speak to the creation of Al Qaeda by the United States to waste Russian energies in Afghanistan in a drawn out conflict with a phantom enemy, the Soviet-Afghan war.

I will only go back to the mid-90's, to talk about the PNAC document, specifically the document that speaks about "Rebuilding Americas Defenses".  The Project for a New American Century was originally formulated in a Washington think tank in the mid-90's.  The goal was expanded American military dominance.  The truth is, our country has not been "Democratic" abroad for over a century.  Our moral compass has slowly eroded away against the profits of war and the sheepish nature of the American public.  We have been led to a fascist pattern of intervention in many countries around the world since the end of WW2, since the beloved FDR greatly expanded the Federal Governemnt.  Pres. Dwight Eisenhower's warning of the threat of the "military-industrial complex" has come full circle.

Today, a Russian fighter jet was downed by Turkey's anti-air missiles.  This is a blatant betrayal of an unspoken alliance between the "empowered" countries of the world to "eliminate" terrorism.   There are multiple articles published and there has been a public disclosure of Turkey's backing of the FSA (free syrian army) that is another name for Al-Qaeda in Syria.  So is Turkey really against Islamic-Terrorism?  I would say no, and Russia's efforts to defend their ally Bashar Al-Assad, Syria's president, has moved the "Iron Country" into a position that is impossible to retreat from.

However, before we delve into all of that, we must understand the origins of this planned operation to destabilize the middle east.  We must talk about the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) which outlines the war crimes for which Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Bush Jr., and others should be tried.  Recently, General (Ret) Wesley Clark exposed the plan to destabilize the middle east in a cascading succession, which, in part, to the uninitiated, looked like the Arab Spring, the revolution of "freedom".

Although, the PNAC document that lays out an actual plan, calling for a new "Pearl Harbor", has been yanked from the net, there are plenty of other examples of the "schemers" exposing themselves and openly explaining their desires for conquest, believing that the average citizen does not watch C-Span (which is true for the most part).  Vladimir Putin, recently, has also done much "outing" of the western countries that have funded, backed, and weaponized ISIS/ISIL/AL-QAEDA.

 The PNAC document is the essential "Rosetta Stone" for anyone who wants to know WHY we are in the middle east, WHY we are involved in countries that people had never heard of before.  Of course now here we are in a second term of the Obama administration, the 7th term of the Bush/Clinton/Obama dynasty.  If PNAC was a creation of the Neo-Cons of Bush Jr.'s administration and Dick Cheney, how does this relate to Barack Obama, the Nobel Peace Prize winner?

Well, I propose to you, Dinesh D'souza.  D'Souza's films that are a brutal indictment of Obama and his ideology.

The accusation that Pres. Obama subscribes to an ideology of ant-colonialism is just one facet of what I present in my argument for the next stage of "Global Militarization".

Now this will sound a little strange....
By dropping the defense of the American Military with the "draw down" that has happened in recent years, Obama isn't actually opposing the Neo-Con war cry.  He is simply the set-up for the next round.  If the object, the goal is to create a global military force, it only makes sense that you make your military much more inter-dependent with those of the rest of the world.   We have been having frequent military drills with the Chinese military.

 "Today American's would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful. This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government." - Henry Kissinger

The End Game, the importance of today's happenings is this: World War. Turkey is a member of NATO and thereby America is obligated to protect her from any Russian aggression.  This is quite the quagmire that Russia has been placed.  Any attacks from Russia will result in a NATO response.  Any response from NATO will engage the Chinese and Iranians. 

Obama is not a counter agent to the plan set out by those who use the revolving door of government to make millions and billions in no-bid contracts. By allowing and stimulating the growth of Islamic terrorism, a new clandestine "Cold War" scenario has been created, by which a "Hot War" can emerge.

The sun has never set on the British Empire and although colonialism in Africa and Asia and the Americas has "ended", the agenda continues through economic colonialism.  We do not have to make a country hang our flag or banner at their government facilities for major companies that control the energy and infrastructure of a country and their central bank can still enslave them. 

The Fog of War is the cover of confusion that elites, bankers, and politicians use to get away with the most immoral of acts while amassing greater "control".  The result of WW1 was the creation of the League of Nations, an organization designed to foment more centralized control over the nation-states of the world.  The result of WW2 was the United Nations.  The creation of these organizations was overwhelmingly ratified because of the desire to prevent greater atrocities committed by human hands.  What atrocities will we witness this time? What will the system reset to? How can you get on the right side of history when right and wrong have never been so grey?

As the world inches closer to another global conflict, the situation is far more convoluted than it had been in the past. With the advent of the internet, cyberspace and the weaponization of outer-space, there is no telling how dangerous this next conflict will be.  The entire earth may well be a colony of an "Elisium-esque" future where the elite float into the cosmos and we fight each other over race and sex.